Freedom Watch USA
  • Freedom Watch
  • About Us
  • Media
  • Cases
  • Store
  • Contact
  • Donate

Subscribe

Please enter your email address to receive Freedom Watch updates on the suggested topics below. You can change or cancel your subscription at any time.


    Press releases by Freedom Watch
    Daily tweets by Larry Klayman
    Videos from Freedom Watch TV
    Special Prosecutor with Larry Klayman weekly podcast
    Weekly columns by Larry Klayman
    Other updates

    What's Hot

    Judges Destroying Trump’s America – Help Us Defeat Them!

    May 2, 2025

    Larry Klayman Representing Laura Loomer defamation suit against Bill Maher.

    April 6, 2025

    Freedomwatch is preparing class action lawsuits against anyone who negatively impacting Tesla Stock, to stop Domestic Terrorism!

    March 26, 2025
    Freedom Watch USAFreedom Watch USA
    Donate
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Media
    • Cases
    • Store
    • Contact
    • FW Substack Newsletter
    Freedom Watch USA
    DONATE
    Home»Uncategorized»NSA Data Program Temporarily Blocked By DC Judge
    Uncategorized

    NSA Data Program Temporarily Blocked By DC Judge

    Freedom WatchBy Freedom WatchNovember 10, 2015

    By Jacob Fischler

    Law360, Washington (November 9, 2015, 12:25 PM ET) – A D.C. federal judge on Monday ordered the National Security Agency to cease its bulk telephony metadata program – 20 days before the program was set to expire anyway under the USA Freedom Act – saying the practice likely violated the Fourth Amendment.

    U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon issued a preliminary injunction against the NSA on behalf of a law firm that subscribes to Verizon Wireless Business Network, the only wireless company the government has explicitly acknowledged participated in the controversial phone data collection program. Despite government arguments there was no proof VWBN still participated in the program, the judge found it was likely the Verizon unit’s involvement continued.

    “The government’s position that VBNS may no longer be a participant in the program is fundamentally at odds with its ever-escalating concerns of terrorist threats,” Judge Leon said. “It defies common sense to argue, as they apparently do, that the government has chosen to omit from this breathtakingly broad metadata collection program a provider that the government has surveilled in the past and that, presumably has the infrastructure to continue assisting in that surveillance.”

    Long-standing efforts by lead plaintiff Larry Klayman to force the government to end the program were stymied by the fact that he was not a VWBN subscriber and thus could not prove his metadata had ever been collected. A fourth amended complaint added attorney J.J. Little and his firm, J.J. Little & Associates PC in September, addressing that issue.

    Little was likely to prevail in showing the NSA program violated the Constitution’s prohibition on unlawful searches and seizures because bulk collection of phone metadata constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, violating citizens’ reasonable expectations of privacy, Judge Leon said. Further, the judge was likely to find the practice unreasonable, as the law allows only limited exceptions to prohibitions of warrantless search, he said.

    The government had argued reforms to the program – including mandating a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge sign off on the searches and limiting the information returned from any particular query of the data – rendered actual invasions of citizen privacy unlikely, according to Judge Leon’s opinion Monday.

    But the judge rejected that view, objecting to the lack of specific targeting in the “sweeping, and truly astounding program that targets millions of Americans arbitrarily and indiscriminately.” He also blasted the program for being “shrouded in secrecy,” saying people had not been made aware of the program and given an opportunity to avoid it.

    Although Judge Leon said he agreed with the NSA’s stated goal of intercepting potential terrorist attacks, he noted the government had not provided a single example of a threat that was foiled through phone data collection.

    The judge concluded the 43-page opinion with a nod to the winding-down of the NSA program, established in June with the passing of the Freedom Act, but said it was important for the judiciary branch to address the underlying constitutional issues.

    “With the government’s authority to operate the bulk telephony metadata program, quickly coming to an end, this case is perhaps the last chapter in the judiciary’s evaluation of this particular program’s compatibility with the Constitution,” he said. “It will not, however, be the last chapter in the ongoing struggle to balance privacy rights with national security interests under our Constitution in an age of evolving technological wizardry.”

    In a phone interview Monday, Klayman said he was “ecstatic” about the decision, saying it would reverberate far beyond Little’s firm.

    “It’s of general applicability,” he said. “The judge stood up for all Americans.”

    A spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Justice said in an email Monday the government was “reviewing the decision.”

    Late last month, the government asked Judge Leon to consider the Second Circuit’s opinion in a related American Civil Liberties Union case, citing its finding that Congress intended an orderly transition from the program that the court should not meddle in to provide short-term relief. The Second Circuit found that Congress had made a considered judgment to keep the program in effect for six months to ensure authorities have the tools they need to fight terrorism.

    Judge Leon’s December 2013 opinion found Klayman and co-plaintiffs Charles and Mary Ann Strange were also likely to win their case on their Fourth Amendment claim and he issued a preliminary injunction at that time, but immediately stayed that injunction, foreseeing an appeal would be quickly forthcoming and decided. Instead, the case took nearly two years to return to his court after the D.C. Circuit found Klayman and the Stranges lacked standing.

    Klayman is representing himself and the other plaintiffs.

    The government is represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Joseph H. Hunt, Anthony J. Coppolino, James J. Gilligan, Rodney Patton, Julia A. Berman and Caroline J. Anderson of the U.S. Department of Justice.

    The case is Klayman v. Obama et al., case number 1:13-cv-00851, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    – Editing by Rebecca Flanagan.

    Freedom Watch
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Freedomwatch is preparing class action lawsuits against anyone who negatively impacting Tesla Stock, to stop Domestic Terrorism!

    March 26, 2025

    Supreme Court Sellouts and Judicial Tyranny Demand Radical Reform NOW!

    March 11, 2025

    FREEDOM WATCH COVID CLASS ACTION GOES FORWARD TO DEFAULT JUDGMENT VS. CHICOM WUHAN LAB!

    February 12, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Book

    Get your copy of Klayman’s It Takes a Revolution and It Takes a Counter-Revolution

    February 25, 2023
    Top Posts

    Judges Destroying Trump’s America – Help Us Defeat Them!

    May 2, 2025

    Freedomwatch is preparing class action lawsuits against anyone who negatively impacting Tesla Stock, to stop Domestic Terrorism!

    March 26, 2025

    Supreme Court Sellouts and Judicial Tyranny Demand Radical Reform NOW!

    March 11, 2025

    FREEDOM WATCH COVID CLASS ACTION GOES FORWARD TO DEFAULT JUDGMENT VS. CHICOM WUHAN LAB!

    February 12, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Blog

    Judges Destroying Trump’s America – Help Us Defeat Them!

    By freedomwatchusa_nurmsiMay 2, 2025

    Dear Patriot,The corrupt judicial and legal establishment is throttling President Trump’s divinely appointed mission to…

    Larry Klayman Representing Laura Loomer defamation suit against Bill Maher.

    April 6, 2025

    Freedomwatch is preparing class action lawsuits against anyone who negatively impacting Tesla Stock, to stop Domestic Terrorism!

    March 26, 2025

    Supreme Court Sellouts and Judicial Tyranny Demand Radical Reform NOW!

    March 11, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.


      Press releases by Freedom Watch
      Daily tweets by Larry Klayman
      Videos from Freedom Watch TV
      Special Prosecutor with Larry Klayman weekly podcast
      Weekly columns by Larry Klayman
      Other updates

      Book

      WHORES: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment

      February 25, 2023
      About Us
      About Us

      Freedom Watch USA, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) public interest group that promotes ethics in government and the legal system through educational endeavors and peaceful and legal actions. We expose and prosecute domestic and foreign corruption, as well as promote and protect law enforcement, on behalf of the citizenry of the United States in furtherance of Freedom Watch USA's America First mission.

      Contact

      Freedom Watch USA, Inc.
      7050 W Palmetto Park Rd.
      Suite 15-264
      Boca Raton, FL 33433

      leklayman@yahoo.com
      daj142182@gmail.com

      202-609-7336

      Subscribe to Updates

      Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.


        Press releases by Freedom Watch
        Daily tweets by Larry Klayman
        Videos from Freedom Watch TV
        Special Prosecutor with Larry Klayman weekly podcast
        Weekly columns by Larry Klayman
        Other updates

        • Home
        • About Us
        • Media
        • Cases
        • Store
        • Contact
        • Donate
        © 2025 Freedom Watch, USA Inc.

        Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.